One of the biggest problems in retirement planning is making sure a pile of money lasts through your retirement. I have read hundreds of articles about this topic, and still haven’t a perfect solution to this problem. Most recently, I looked into the idea of buying a ETF that tracks stocks with 10+ year histories of growing dividends.
The imperfect (!) solution I chose is to first build a portfolio designed for total return and enough downside protection such that I can hold through an extended downturn. As you will see below, the total income is a little under 3% of the portfolio annually. I could easily crank out a portfolio with a 4% income rate, or even 5% income. But you have to take some additional risks to get there.
Starting with a more traditional portfolio, only then do I try to only spend the dividends and interest. The analogy I fall back on is owning a rental property. If you are reliably getting rent checks that increase with inflation, you can sit back calmly and ignore what the house might sell for on the open market. With this method, I am more confident that the income cover our expenses for the rest of our lives.
I track the “TTM Yield” or “12 Mo. Yield” from Morningstar, which the sum of a fund’s total trailing 12-month interest and dividend payments divided by the last month’s ending share price (NAV) plus any capital gains distributed over the same period. (Index funds have low turnover and thus little in capital gains.) I like this measure because it is based on historical distributions and not a forecast. Below is a very close approximation of my investment portfolio (2/3rd stocks and 1/3rd bonds).
Asset Class / Fund | % of Portfolio | Trailing 12-Month Yield (Taken 6/13/19) | Yield Contribution |
US Total Stock Vanguard Total Stock Market Fund (VTI, VTSAX) |
25% | 1.99% | 0.50% |
US Small Value Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) |
5% | 2.20% | 0.11% |
International Total Stock Vanguard Total International Stock Market Fund (VXUS, VTIAX) |
25% | 3.00% | 0.75% |
Emerging Markets Vanguard Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) |
5% | 2.69% | 0.13% |
US Real Estate Vanguard REIT Index Fund (VNQ, VGSLX) |
6% | 3.96% | 0.24% |
Intermediate-Term High Quality Bonds Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt Fund (VWIUX) |
17% | 2.79% | 0.47% |
Inflation-Linked Treasury Bonds Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (VAIPX) |
17% | 2.66% | 0.45% |
Totals | 100% | 2.65% |
Over the last 12 months, my portfolio has distributed 2.65% of its current value as income. One of the things I like about using this number is that when stock prices drop, this percentage metric usually goes up – which makes me feel better in a gloomy market. When stock prices go up, this percentage metric usually goes down, which keeps me from getting too happy. This also applies to the relative performance of US and International stocks. In this way, this serves as a rough form of a valuation-based dynamic withdrawal rate.
In practical terms, I let all of my dividends and interest accumulate without automatic reinvestment. I like to look at this money as my “paycheck” arriving on a regular basis. Then, as with my real paycheck, I can choose to either spend it or reinvest in more stocks and bonds. This gets me used the feeling of living off my portfolio and learning to ignore the price swings.
We are a real 40-year-old couple with three young kids, and this money has to last us a lifetime (without stomach ulcers). This number does not dictate how much we actually spend every year, but it gives me an idea of how comfortable I am with our withdrawal rate. We spend less than this amount now, but I like to plan for the worst while hoping for the best. For now, we are quite fortunate to be able to do work that is meaningful to us, in an amount where we still enjoy it and don’t feel burned out.
Life is not a Monte Carlo simulation, and you need a plan to ride out the rough times. Even if you run a bunch of numbers looking back to 1920 and it tells you some number is “safe”, that’s still trying to use 100 years of history to forecast 50 years into the future. Michael Pollan says that you can sum up his eating advice as “Eat food, not too much, mostly plants.” You can sum up my thoughts on portfolio income as “Spend mostly dividends and interest. Don’t eat too much principal.” At the same time, live your life. Enjoy your time with family and friends. You may be more likely to run out of time than run out of money.
In the end, I do think using a 3% withdrawal rate is a reasonable target for something retiring young (before age 50) and a 4% withdrawal rate is a reasonable target for one retiring at a more traditional age (closer to 65). If you’re still in the accumulation phase, you don’t really need a more accurate number than that. Focus on your earning potential via better career moves, investing in your skillset, and/or look for entrepreneurial opportunities where you own equity in a business.
Jonathan, any thoughts on how a combination of immediate and deferred annuities might fit into meeting your goals? Thanks!
I’m still kind of mulling that one over, especially with interest rates so low right now.
I have always found these rule of thumb retirement numbers beyond useless. I can tell you right up front, a couple of two, with no more children, credit card or mortgage expenses need at least $2 million in income producing investment/ savings to retire for life. Perhaps $1.75 million if the members of the Fed are finally put in prison where they belong and we get back to real rate neutrality. Under the current regime of rate repression with no end insight that will afford you a comfortable middle class life when combined with your Social Security and Medicare benefits.
That means Kias not BMWs, flying economy not business, an iPhone 8 not a Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus and rigorously tracking your expenses and revenue.
That’s the bottom line all the rest is yahoo finance meaningless noise.